I never really considered this weeks in class topic/ presentation as a Journalists responsibility before now but I suppose its true. It is to share news they find with the world. With all the changing ways news is told in the world today we must share our talents with the world as well in global coverage of large events. now a days with the with the demand for speed and news, journalists have to be careful before blurting out incorrect info on tweeter that isn’t accurate or posting a video on youtube that hasn’t had it’s sources checked. They need to be careful about the things they post. being fast at reporting does not outweigh accuracy when it comes to the news. when they’re trying to keep up with the fast pace of the world today be clear and accurate!
Here is a interesting article about the topic
on USA today's paper http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/story/2012-04-24/journalism-social-media-giffords-paterno-nikki-haley/54513448/1
Thursday, October 17, 2013
Principles of Journalism, class recap #7 - October 22nd
Headline: NYT publishes top secret government secrets
Today's class topic was about he Pentagon papers. It sparked a fairly intense conversation that connected to the more recent Edward Snowden case. It was good to see that people had opinions for themselves and wouldn't back down due to popular or peer belief. I personally wasn't refreshed enough on the topic to participate in the conversation but could see each side's points and why certain conclusions would matter depending on how things really occurred.
I thought that the group that presented did a really good job in bringing up the debate and controlling in a way that helped everyone come somewhat familiar witht he facts and how that was similar to the past pentagon papers.
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/p/pentagon_papers/index.html
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB48/
Today's class topic was about he Pentagon papers. It sparked a fairly intense conversation that connected to the more recent Edward Snowden case. It was good to see that people had opinions for themselves and wouldn't back down due to popular or peer belief. I personally wasn't refreshed enough on the topic to participate in the conversation but could see each side's points and why certain conclusions would matter depending on how things really occurred.
I thought that the group that presented did a really good job in bringing up the debate and controlling in a way that helped everyone come somewhat familiar witht he facts and how that was similar to the past pentagon papers.
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/p/pentagon_papers/index.html
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB48/
Principles of Journalism, class recap #5 - October 8th
This weeks group introduced a very important topic that we must all keep at the forefront of your minds as journalists. That being, all we work to achieve is centered around the benefit to the average day citizens and readers of our papers etc. Educate and breakdown the content that can impact them and to share in a concise unbiased manner that then the people can create their own opinion on that matter is critical to our business. It is a fine balance that we must judge between in the content of our shows papers etc of the popular entertainment and that of important controversial issues. Because it is a business and we need to pay the bills and stay employed but need to provide and inform the public of big issues in their own neighborhood city state country world.
Here is a good artlice about the responsabilities we need to provide the public. http://www.ieiseattle.org/journalists.htm
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
Principles of Journalism, class recap #3 - Sep 25th
Last week our class talked about how journalist's see themselves within society. Although the role they play varies between nation and the world as a whole there are common threads amongst journalist's that are worth nothing. The Watch dog aspect. News reporters in general see themselves as a sort of guard for the average American or citizen again their at times quite government officials. Although the government may have their own reasons for keeping things hush hush. information in reporter's eyes is seen as free and needed to have full disclosure. Much of what they do is to bridge this gap from the elite and prevy of intelligence to the every day man and women so they might be able to come to opinion themselves.
This may not be the case at all times though, somtimes reporters have biases and an intent t persued their readers to a similiar state of mind. this is generaly frowned upon int he united states with teh ideal to stay neutural and to simply divulge information without persuaiding one way or another. but outseide the USA reporters are very passionate and attempt out right that they are activiely trying to change opinions.
2 way mirror - our news reflect us as well as us in the news. we must be conscious how and what we consume in news. hold true to ourselves and respect others opinions.
http://www.qchron.com/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/tv-news-bias/article_0a17f096-4e41-54be-a0ce-7cd4d6e8ae54.html
http://www.umich.edu/~newsbias/manifestations.html
This may not be the case at all times though, somtimes reporters have biases and an intent t persued their readers to a similiar state of mind. this is generaly frowned upon int he united states with teh ideal to stay neutural and to simply divulge information without persuaiding one way or another. but outseide the USA reporters are very passionate and attempt out right that they are activiely trying to change opinions.
2 way mirror - our news reflect us as well as us in the news. we must be conscious how and what we consume in news. hold true to ourselves and respect others opinions.
http://www.qchron.com/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/tv-news-bias/article_0a17f096-4e41-54be-a0ce-7cd4d6e8ae54.html
http://www.umich.edu/~newsbias/manifestations.html
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Principles of Journalism, class recap #2 - Sep 18th
This week was the first week that we had a student presentation. The topic was about the John F. Kennedy assassination and how the story was told and covered in the news.
The group started off by informing us that news as we know it today was first marketed and distributed as early as 59 BC in Rome known as the "ACTA DIURNA" translated to mean The Daily Events. The first TV news broadcast that was of any real notice by the public was coverage of the Pearl Harbor attacks. But it still went fairly unviewed due to the availability of television sets to the average American etc. It wasn't till the Assassination of the president, John F. Kennedy which was televised that this new form of news sharing really take off. It was the first real event that a the nation could share in the combined experience together. By tuning into the televised event, rebroadcast, and follow up stories the general audience felt united and were amazed by the immediacy and detail of the news that made the horrific act feel all that much more real. People we glued to their television sets for days in morning and panic watching as they were fed constant updates as to the condition of the president and the attempts to find the perpetrator and bringing him to justice. Rules were not yet established about content that was appropriate to share over the air and the actual bullets could clearly be seen hitting their target in the chest of the president and later with a mist of red blood the kill shot hitting his head. It was the first time I had seen the footage and I was amazed at the raw nature of the imagery. I have no doubt of why the American people felt so strongly about the event and how they could be shocked and awed over the new form of news sharing that TV brought to their front rooms. Reporters themselves struggled to keep their composure as to the shock of the what they had just witnessed having no time to personally cope with the situation before they were supposed to report on it.
As a result to the coverage many rules were established in what should/ could be shown over air etc.
One last thing to mention was as interesting tid bit was the tele- type which was basically the twitter of time.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDCt7dRndDo
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/jfk-50/NATL-John-F-Kennedy-assassination-in-Popular-Culture-50th-anniversary-222228441.html
The group started off by informing us that news as we know it today was first marketed and distributed as early as 59 BC in Rome known as the "ACTA DIURNA" translated to mean The Daily Events. The first TV news broadcast that was of any real notice by the public was coverage of the Pearl Harbor attacks. But it still went fairly unviewed due to the availability of television sets to the average American etc. It wasn't till the Assassination of the president, John F. Kennedy which was televised that this new form of news sharing really take off. It was the first real event that a the nation could share in the combined experience together. By tuning into the televised event, rebroadcast, and follow up stories the general audience felt united and were amazed by the immediacy and detail of the news that made the horrific act feel all that much more real. People we glued to their television sets for days in morning and panic watching as they were fed constant updates as to the condition of the president and the attempts to find the perpetrator and bringing him to justice. Rules were not yet established about content that was appropriate to share over the air and the actual bullets could clearly be seen hitting their target in the chest of the president and later with a mist of red blood the kill shot hitting his head. It was the first time I had seen the footage and I was amazed at the raw nature of the imagery. I have no doubt of why the American people felt so strongly about the event and how they could be shocked and awed over the new form of news sharing that TV brought to their front rooms. Reporters themselves struggled to keep their composure as to the shock of the what they had just witnessed having no time to personally cope with the situation before they were supposed to report on it.
As a result to the coverage many rules were established in what should/ could be shown over air etc.
One last thing to mention was as interesting tid bit was the tele- type which was basically the twitter of time.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDCt7dRndDo
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/jfk-50/NATL-John-F-Kennedy-assassination-in-Popular-Culture-50th-anniversary-222228441.html
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Principles of Journalism, class recap #1 - Sep 11th
As assigned by my Communication Professor, I 'am to write a short recap of each of the classes I attend with my own unique thoughts on the topic we discussed.
This past week the subject was a short history of journalism and how that related and effected how we receive news today. It was interesting as well as comforting to know that their quasi philosophical model that journalist have tried to abide to in dispersing the news. The 6 C's: Constitutional, constructive, community oriented, credible, courageous & guided by conscience. My first impression of this list of journalistic ethics was comforting to know that we had something like this in place. As I said that they at least had some unifying guide to keep news at some quality or state and presented with judgment and discernment for their audience. As I thought more upon the 6 C's I become somewhat surprise that list was it. If you think about it there is a lot of room for personal interpretation on how for say one might go about being "courageous" in their news telling. I suppose that a code of ethics for something as vital as for the news should not interfere with the freedom to speech that is so important in our country. It is exciting to become more familiar with how we as fellow members of society have developed appropriate and efficient ways of sharing information about each other across the globe and within our own communities. I hope to continue to learn and develop my own writing and communication skills to be clear and informative if not engaging and compelling on future audiences I may touch.
One last note to mention Professor Campbell touched on a branch of journalism known as solution journalism with the purpose to have results come from the news they disperse. That sounded very interesting to me & I’d like to take some more time to see what that’s all about.
http://www.ehow.com/facts_7284791_code-conduct-journalists.html
http://media.gn.apc.org/nujcode.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)